1. Call to Enforce US American Law & Project American Values
The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment prohibits government from encouraging or promoting ("establishing") religion in any way. That's why we don't have an official religion of the United States. This means that the government may not give political nor financial support to any religion.
Islam must not be given any support or special religious ‘rights’ that infringe upon the public and American culture.
Declare any law that violates the Constitution and Bill of Rights Null and Void - Void Sharia as a ‘pseudo’ religious legal system intended to subvert American legal code. Sharia must not be allowed any kind of sanction in America. Sharia law can include rulings such as wife beating, punishments of torture, and retribution killing - clearly not under the applied protections provided by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Engage in a united project to actively protect, support and encourage the immigration of persecuted minorities from around the globe. Islamists are not that minority and are instead the persecutors whose mandate is to force everyone to accept sharia law - stop the immigration of Islamic Imams intolerant of other religions and who are intolerant of our laws, including freedom of speech.
Provide public education about Islam and Sharia Law to improve cultural awareness and discourse. This education should be provided by independent researchers and not be applied under the supervision and auspices of groups connected to any political Islamic organization.
Stop the silencing and placement of fetters on police and government officials regarding Islamic crimes against the public. Democracy hinges on free speech and free public discourse.
Have a robust deportation program. Incarcerate Islamic fundamentalist Imams and proponents in totally separate compounds since, along with Islamic propaganda in public education institutions, prisons are another targeted breeding ground for Islamic recruitment.
Realize that there is a contingent of good and spiritual muslims who have lived under the oppression of authoritarian and fundamentalist expressions of government who wish to maintain their cultural heritage, provide service, and have good lives - not under Sharia law (this falls under the don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater clause.) Yes that would make them a target, but we will stand with them and not against.
2. Deep Assessment and Unique Considerations
My line of inquiry goes like this; Is there some way I can find agreement with the statement ‘there is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his Messenger.’ honestly and without being coerced? What would need to take place for me to come to this recognition?
My personal thought on the topic goes thus; I notice that the interesting part of learning Islam, whether it be from Islamic or Western scholars, is that it requires interpretation. For instance, what I’ve learned so far is that there is this term called the ‘rule of abrogation’. My mentioning this term is not to engage in proving or disproving an interpretation - just notice that there is a certain way of ‘weighting’ the teachings in order to put emphasis on one part over the other.
Another point has to do with my ignorance of the topic of Islam. I always thought that Islam was connected to Judaism just like Christianity because both ‘borrowed’ from the ancient Hebrew texts. Is not the God Creator of Islam that of the Bible? Or is the one true God Creator of Israel different from the one true God of Islam?
Are both ‘One True God of Creation’ somehow different therefore there are actually more than ‘One True God Creator’? I suppose that would
be a source for unreasonable argument.
The question of timing comes to mind. In the old testament, there’s ‘a time for peace and a time for war.’ For Muhammad, and according to the rule of abrogation, there seems to be only one time for peace early on - then it turned into a continuous time for war.
What would qualify Muhammad as the last Prophet? Is it because he had some special quality in himself? It would seem that the emphasis is in fact that he wrote something unique and final in his discourse from the One True Creator God of everyone. What was that one final kernel?
Muhammad himself seemed to be a rather normal person with perhaps a few more interesting attitudes than most. I don’t believe that Muhammad was claiming any sort of divinity, rather acting as a conduit. The messages seemed to reinforce the importance of Muhammad so to gather a following, of an ever increasing tribe of peoples.
This is were the use of force becomes interesting. But I want to land on the one thing that precedes the use of force - that is intent. To use the most positive light possible, which I believe is the one glue that holds Islam together, has tribal roots.
3. Messenger and Murderer. Incongruent or just seventh century politics as usual?
Why is it necessary to lie to the Kafir (the disgusting unbeliever)? The answer is that lying makes it easier to convert or enslave someone to Islam (submission to ‘Allah’ as defined by Muhammad thru dreams of Gabriel’s instructions), and is considered a mercy.
The method prescribed in the ’scriptural’ doctrine of Muhammad gained thru the direct instructions from the angel ‘Gabriel’ and by Muhammad's experience in politics was to first lie, then to gag, tax, enslave and murder his opponents whenever he had the advantage - or whenever there was a threat to his advantage such as someone speaking the truth. What effect does this type of leadership have on the people that fall under it’s er... laws?
Is the core of Islam’s doctrine dictatorial? What kind of world view is ‘submission’ to ‘Allah’ as defined by Muhammad’s dreams of Gabriel’s instructions and would it actually lead to world peace? Where is its proof? Is it characteristic of Gabriel to endorse genocide?
Since ‘Allah’ was the name of the moon god of Muhammad’s tribe, how does that play into Muhammad becoming the last prophet of the Jews?http://islamattack.org/resources/The_Life_of_Mohammed-The_Sira.pdf